IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v19y2025i1p39-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring citizen trust in regulatory agencies: A systematic review and ways forward

Author

Listed:
  • Libby Maman
  • Lauren Fahy
  • Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen
  • Moritz Kappler

Abstract

Citizen trust in regulatory agencies is essential for the functioning of society and markets. Trust in regulatory agencies promotes compliance and strengthens trust in regulated sectors. Despite its importance, there is no systematic study on how trust is in this context can be measured best. In response, this article presents findings of a systematic review of measures of trust in regulatory contexts, assessing their utility for measuring citizen trust in regulatory agencies. Our review of recent literature and of seven major international surveys finds several areas for methodological improvement in the measurement of such trust. The review highlights that while trust in various institutions is extensively studied, high‐quality measures for regulatory agencies specifically are lacking. Both one‐off studies of trust in regulatory agencies and large international surveys of trust in government reveal an absence of systematic and consistent measurement of trust in these agencies. We propose recommendations to enhance measurement consistency, transparency, and contextual diversity. This study underscores the urgency of addressing this critical dimension of trust and provides a roadmap for improving our understanding of citizen trust in regulatory agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Libby Maman & Lauren Fahy & Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen & Moritz Kappler, 2025. "Measuring citizen trust in regulatory agencies: A systematic review and ways forward," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 39-86, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:39-86
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:39-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.