IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v19y2025i1p161-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the relationship between regulation and innovation from an interdisciplinary perspective: A critical systematic review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Queiroz Cunha
  • Flavia Donadelli

Abstract

A considerable amount of work has focused on “regulatory innovation” in the social sciences. This scholarship has conceptually defined certain types of regulatory changes as innovations and explored how regulation, as a policy instrument, alters the pace of technological innovation. More recently, a renewed interest for policy mixes and more dynamism in industrial innovation policies around the world has increased the demand for advanced knowledge in this area. In this article, we systematically review the literature on the innovation‐regulation interplay, documenting its evolution, the prevailing thematic areas, and overlooked topics. While the orthodox regulatory stance, modeled on economic efficiency principles, is by far the main thrust, heterodox accounts, premised on systemic and evolutionary thinking, appear as important variations. The latter have recently burgeoned with new theoretical developments promoting the idea of regulation that not only allows for, but intentionally directs innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Queiroz Cunha & Flavia Donadelli, 2025. "Mapping the relationship between regulation and innovation from an interdisciplinary perspective: A critical systematic review of the literature," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 161-181, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:161-181
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:161-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.