IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v18y2024i3p874-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding patterns of stakeholder participation in public commenting on bureaucratic policymaking: Evidence from the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Bunea
  • Sergiu Lipcean

Abstract

What explains the levels and diversity of stakeholder participation in public commenting on bureaucratic policymaking? We examine a novel dataset on a stakeholder engagement mechanism recently introduced by the European Commission containing information about 1258 events organized between 2016 and 2019. We highlight the importance of administrative acts' characteristics and acknowledge the role of policy area type. Acts corresponding to early policy stages, broader in scope, less technical, and more explicit about feedback loop rules, that is, roadmaps, inception impact assessments and delegated acts, generate significantly more comments, from more diverse stakeholders, relative to legislative proposals, and draft implementing acts. Regulatory and distributive policies generate significantly more comments than interior and foreign policies. Diversity is significantly higher in distributive policies but only relative to foreign policies. We contribute by showing the power of administrative acts in influencing stakeholder participation and diversity across decision stages and policy areas and shaping bias in interest representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Bunea & Sergiu Lipcean, 2024. "Understanding patterns of stakeholder participation in public commenting on bureaucratic policymaking: Evidence from the European Union," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 874-895, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:874-895
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:874-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.