IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i3p755-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's corporate credit reporting system: A comparison with the United States and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Krause
  • Mo Chen
  • Lena Wassermann
  • Doris Fischer
  • Jens Grossklags

Abstract

Corporate credit reporting (CCR), which aims at increasing trust in corporates, constitutes an intriguing, yet understudied set of regulatory institutions as it is both a regulatory object and subject at the same time. Differences in national CCR systems pose challenges for multinational companies and have increasingly become a subject of international conflicts on regulatory standards. In this context, the case of China deserves special attention since the country pursues both institutional divergence and convergence with international examples. Hence, the characterization of China's regulatory regime remains difficult. By comparing the institutional context of CCR in China to those in the United States and Germany, this paper sheds light on a specific aspect of China's complex regulatory regime. At the same time, it provides insights into the Chinese manifestation of CCR, which are important for the international business community.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Krause & Mo Chen & Lena Wassermann & Doris Fischer & Jens Grossklags, 2023. "China's corporate credit reporting system: A comparison with the United States and Germany," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 755-771, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:755-771
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12491
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:755-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.