IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i2p512-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stay or exit: How do international nongovernmental organizations respond to institutional pressures under authoritarianism?

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Li
  • May Farid

Abstract

International nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) are increasingly important players in global politics and development. However, they are undergoing significant adaptations as governments worldwide have instituted restrictions to regulate their activities. What explains the various ways in which they respond to these institutional pressures? In our study of INGO responses to a new restrictive law in China, we identify four strategic responses with varying levels of compliance: legal registration, provisional strategy, localization, and exit. The institutional pressures—strategic responses link is influenced by INGOs' adaptive capacity, which is in turn shaped by an organization's issue sensitivity, value‐add, government ties, and reputational authority. The integrated framework we develop for INGO strategic responses can shed light on state‐INGO relations in other countries, many of which are subject to increasingly stringent regulations and a closing political environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Li & May Farid, 2023. "Stay or exit: How do international nongovernmental organizations respond to institutional pressures under authoritarianism?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 512-530, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:512-530
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendra E Dupuy & James Ron & Aseem Prakash, 2015. "Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 419-456, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urquía-Grande, Elena & Estébanez, Raquel Pérez & Alcaraz-Quiles, Francisco José, 2022. "Impact of Non-Profit Organizations’ Accountability: Empirical evidence from the democratic Republic of Congo," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    2. Nicole Janz & Noel Johnston & Paasha Mahdavi, 2022. "Expropriation and human rights: does the seizure of FDI signal wider repression?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 847-875, October.
    3. Appe Susan & Barragán Daniel & Telch Fabian, 2019. "Organized Civil Society Under Authoritarian Populism: Cases from Ecuador," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Wasif Rafeel & Prakash Aseem, 2017. "Do Government and Foreign Funding Influence Individual Donations to Religious Nonprofits? A Survey Experiment in Pakistan," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 237-273, September.
    5. Nicola Banks & Tony Brockington, 2019. "Mapping the UK’s development NGOs: income, geography and contributions to international development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 352019, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    6. Inken von Borzyskowski, 2016. "Resisting democracy assistance: Who seeks and receives technical election assistance?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 247-282, June.
    7. Tigist Grieve & Rafael Mitchell, 0. "Promoting Meaningful and Equitable Relationships? Exploring the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Funding Criteria from the Perspectives of African Partners," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    8. Naomi Hossain & Marjoke Oosterom, 2021. "The Implications of Closing Civic Space for Hunger and Poverty in the Global South," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S5), pages 59-69, July.
    9. Suparna Chaudhry & Marc Dotson & Andrew Heiss, 2021. "Who Cares about Crackdowns? Exploring the Role of Trust in Individual Philanthropy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S5), pages 45-58, July.
    10. Parkes, Jenny & Ross, Freya Johnson & Heslop, Jo, 2020. "The ebbs and flows of policy enactments on school-related gender-based violence: Insights from Ethiopia, Zambia, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Wondirad, Amare & Ewnetu, Biruk, 2019. "Community participation in tourism development as a tool to foster sustainable land and resource use practices in a national park milieu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Tigist Grieve & Rafael Mitchell, 2020. "Promoting Meaningful and Equitable Relationships? Exploring the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Funding Criteria from the Perspectives of African Partners," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(3), pages 514-528, July.
    13. Nora Berger‐Kern & Fabian Hetz & Rebecca Wagner & Jonas Wolff, 2021. "Defending Civic Space: Successful Resistance Against NGO Laws in Kenya and Kyrgyzstan," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S5), pages 84-94, July.
    14. Ines M. Pousadela & Dominic R. Perera, 2021. "The Enemy Within? Anti‐Rights Groups and Restrictions on Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S5), pages 34-44, July.
    15. Aeshna Badruzzaman, 2023. "Repositioning urban bias: Non‐state providers' use of spatialised networks in Bangladesh," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(1), pages 49-59, February.
    16. Kendra Dupuy & Luc Fransen & Aseem Prakash, 2021. "Restricting NGOs: From Pushback to Accommodation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S5), pages 5-10, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:512-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.