IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/quante/v15y2024i3p571-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing firm conduct

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Duarte
  • Lorenzo Magnolfi
  • Mikkel Sølvsten
  • Christopher Sullivan

Abstract

Evaluating policy in imperfectly competitive markets requires understanding firm behavior. While researchers test conduct via model selection and assessment, we present the advantages of Rivers and Vuong (2002) (RV) model selection under misspecification. However, degeneracy of RV invalidates inference. With a novel definition of weak instruments for testing, we connect degeneracy to instrument strength, derive weak instrument properties of RV, and provide a diagnostic for weak instruments by extending the framework of Stock and Yogo (2005) to model selection. We test vertical conduct (Villas‐Boas (2007)) using common instrument sets. Some are weak, providing no power. Strong instruments support manufacturers setting retail prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Duarte & Lorenzo Magnolfi & Mikkel Sølvsten & Christopher Sullivan, 2024. "Testing firm conduct," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), pages 571-606, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:571-606
    DOI: 10.3982/QE2319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE2319
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/QE2319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:571-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.