IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v36y2025i2p302-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Permafrost Representation: Biophysical Processes in Earth System Models and the Role of Offline Models

Author

Listed:
  • Heidrun Matthes
  • Adrien Damseaux
  • Sebastian Westermann
  • Christian Beer
  • Aaron Boone
  • Eleanor Burke
  • Bertrand Decharme
  • Hélène Genet
  • Elchin Jafarov
  • Moritz Langer
  • Frans‐Jan Parmentier
  • Philipp Porada
  • Anna Gagne‐Landmann
  • Deborah Huntzinger
  • Brendan M. Rogers
  • Christina Schädel
  • Tobias Stacke
  • Jon Wells
  • William R. Wieder

Abstract

Permafrost is undergoing rapid changes due to climate warming, potentially exposing a vast reservoir of carbon to be released to the atmosphere, causing a positive feedback cycle. Despite the importance of this feedback, its specifics remain poorly constrained, because representing permafrost dynamics still poses a significant challenge for Earth System Models (ESMs). This review assesses the current state of permafrost representation in land surface models (LSMs) used in ESMs and offline permafrost models, highlighting both the progress made and the remaining gaps. We identify several key physical processes crucial for permafrost dynamics, including soil thermal regimes, freeze–thaw cycles, and soil hydrology, which are underrepresented in many models. While some LSMs have advanced significantly in incorporating these processes, others lack fundamental elements such as latent heat of freeze–thaw, deep soil columns, and Arctic vegetation dynamics. Offline permafrost models provide valuable insights, offering detailed process testing and aiding the prioritization of improvements in coupled LSMs. Our analysis reveals that while significant progress has been made in incorporating permafrost‐related processes into coupled LSMs, many small‐scale processes crucial for permafrost dynamics remain underrepresented. This is particularly important for capturing the complex interactions between physical and biogeochemical processes required to model permafrost carbon dynamics. We recommend leveraging advancements from offline permafrost models and progressively integrating them into LSMs, while recognizing the computational and technical challenges that may arise in coupled simulations. We highlight the importance of enhancing the representation of physical processes, including through improvements in model resolution and complexity, as this is a fundamental precursor to accurately incorporate biogeochemical processes and capture the permafrost carbon feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidrun Matthes & Adrien Damseaux & Sebastian Westermann & Christian Beer & Aaron Boone & Eleanor Burke & Bertrand Decharme & Hélène Genet & Elchin Jafarov & Moritz Langer & Frans‐Jan Parmentier & Phi, 2025. "Advances in Permafrost Representation: Biophysical Processes in Earth System Models and the Role of Offline Models," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 302-318, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:302-318
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.2269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:302-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.