Author
Listed:
- Alexander Bast
- Mirko Pavoni
- Matthias Lichtenegger
- Johannes Buckel
- Jacopo Boaga
Abstract
Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is widely used to map, characterize, and monitor the ground in alpine and periglacial environments, where coarse blocky surfaces are often ubiquitous. ERT measurements typically use conventional steel electrodes in combination with a water‐soaked sponge. However, ensuring an optimum contact resistance between the electrodes and the ground to obtain high‐quality data is often challenging and requires considerable logistical, physical, and time commitment. To overcome this, we tested a promising sand‐filled, fist‐sized conductive textile electrode. We conducted ERT measurements using both steel and textile electrodes at a landslide and two rock glaciers in the European Alps with coarse blocky surfaces and performed statistical analyses to test the accuracy and precision of the proposed textile electrodes. Our results show that the textile electrodes can be used as an alternative to the conventional steel electrodes without limitations, as they ensure good galvanic contact with the ground and accurate resistivity measurements. The use of textile electrodes also resulted in lower contact resistances, less time invested, physical and logistical advantages, and reduced risk of injury. In the future, this will enable applications such as enhanced ERT monitoring and/or faster (quasi‐3D) imaging of the interior of entire landforms.
Suggested Citation
Alexander Bast & Mirko Pavoni & Matthias Lichtenegger & Johannes Buckel & Jacopo Boaga, 2025.
"The Use of Textile Electrodes for Electrical Resistivity Tomography in Periglacial, Coarse Blocky Terrain: A Comparison With Conventional Steel Electrodes,"
Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 110-122, January.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:110-122
DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2257
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:110-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.