IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v30y2019i3p146-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gas‐emission craters of the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas: A proposed mechanism for lake genesis and development of permafrost landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Yury A. Dvornikov
  • Marina O. Leibman
  • Artem V. Khomutov
  • Alexander I. Kizyakov
  • Petr Semenov
  • Ingeborg Bussmann
  • Evgeny M. Babkin
  • Birgit Heim
  • Alexey Portnov
  • Elena A. Babkina
  • Irina D. Streletskaya
  • Antonina A. Chetverova
  • Anna Kozachek
  • Hanno Meyer

Abstract

This paper describes two gas‐emission craters (GECs) in permafrost regions of the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas. We show that in three consecutive years after GEC formation (2014–2017), both morphometry and hydrochemistry of the inner crater lakes can become indistinguishable from other lakes. Craters GEC‐1 and AntGEC, with initial depths of 50–70 and 15–19 m respectively, have transformed into lakes 3–5 m deep. Crater‐like depressions were mapped in the bottom of 13 out of 22 Yamal lakes. However, we found no evidence that these depressions could have been formed as a result of gas emission. Dissolved methane (dCH4) concentration measured in the water collected from these depressions was at a background level (45 ppm on average). Yet, the concentration of dCH4 from the near‐bottom layer of lake GEC‐1 was significantly higher (824–968 ppm) during initial stages. We established that hydrochemical parameters (dissolved organic carbon, major ions, isotopes) measured in GEC lakes approached values measured in other lakes over time. Therefore, these parameters could not be used to search for Western Siberian lakes that potentially resulted from gas emission. Temperature profiles measured in GEC lakes show that the water column temperatures in GEC‐1 are lower than in Yamal lakes and in AntGEC – close to values of Gydan lakes. Given the initial GEC depth > 50 m, we suggest that at least in GEC‐1 possible re‐freezing of sediments from below might take place. However, with the present data we cannot establish the modern thickness of the closed talik under newly formed GEC lakes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yury A. Dvornikov & Marina O. Leibman & Artem V. Khomutov & Alexander I. Kizyakov & Petr Semenov & Ingeborg Bussmann & Evgeny M. Babkin & Birgit Heim & Alexey Portnov & Elena A. Babkina & Irina D. Str, 2019. "Gas‐emission craters of the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas: A proposed mechanism for lake genesis and development of permafrost landscapes," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 146-162, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:30:y:2019:i:3:p:146-162
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.2014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalya Misyurkeeva & Igor Buddo & Gleb Kraev & Aleksandr Smirnov & Alexey Nezhdanov & Ivan Shelokhov & Anna Kurchatova & Andrei Belonosov, 2022. "Periglacial Landforms and Fluid Dynamics in the Permafrost Domain: A Case from the Taz Peninsula, West Siberia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Vasily Bogoyavlensky & Igor Bogoyavlensky & Roman Nikonov & Vladimir Yakushev & Viacheslav Sevastyanov, 2021. "Permanent Gas Emission from the Seyakha Crater of Gas Blowout, Yamal Peninsula, Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:30:y:2019:i:3:p:146-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.