IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v22y2011i4p291-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal Structure and Geological Context of Ramparted Depressions, Llanpumsaint, Wales

Author

Listed:
  • N. Ross
  • C. Harris
  • P.J. Brabham
  • T.H. Sheppard

Abstract

In Europe, ramparted depressions have traditionally been interpreted as the relict forms of periglacial ground‐ice mounds. In many cases, however, such interpretations have been based on limited subsurface evidence. We present detailed sedimentological and geophysical investigations of ramparted depressions from Llanpumsaint, Wales. These data are used to establish internal structure and to evaluate possible mechanisms for landform formation. Borehole and geophysical data have revealed a thick (∼30 m) sequence of glaciolacustrine sediments beneath the study site. The geological context (drainage of a large proglacial lake) would have been conducive to the formation of: (i) permafrost‐related ground‐ice mounds, at times when exposed frost‐susceptible glaciolacustrine sediments were subject to permafrost aggradation; and (ii) craters associated with the in‐situ meltout of blocks of glacier ice grounded in the lake during periods of falling water levels. Rampart deformation structures are consistent with both models, but units of sand and gravel within the ramparts favour a hypothesis that these landforms represent the collapsed remains of ground‐ice mounds. This study highlights the importance of recognising and evaluating all possible (periglacial and non‐periglacial) models for the development of ramparted depressions. We recommend that future studies carefully consider all possible mechanisms of formation, particularly where subsurface information is limited. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Ross & C. Harris & P.J. Brabham & T.H. Sheppard, 2011. "Internal Structure and Geological Context of Ramparted Depressions, Llanpumsaint, Wales," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 291-305, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:291-305
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.708
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:291-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.