IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v18y2007i3p259-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazard assessment of potential periglacial debris flows based on GIS‐based spatial modelling and geophysical field surveys: a case study in the Swiss Alps

Author

Listed:
  • C. Kneisel
  • C. Rothenbühler
  • F. Keller
  • W. Haeberli

Abstract

Combined geomorphological and geophysical approaches were used to perform a hazard assessment of potential periglacial debris flow. Possible debris flow initiation zones were identified within a GIS‐based model and located based on geomorphic attributes which contribute the most to this type of instability. In permafrost‐affected alpine environments, these include the extent and location of ground ice and permafrost. In a potential debris flow‐starting zone in the Upper Engadine (moraine/debris rock glacier complex Boval) two‐dimensional electrical resistivity surveys were used to detect the presence/absence of permafrost and to estimate active‐layer depth. The results show that the moraine complex represents a periglacial debris reservoir which consists of frozen and unfrozen debris. The ice‐bonded part of the moraine is largely protected from sudden destabilisation and retrogressive erosion can be assumed to be limited. However, future degradation or loss of permafrost in the lower parts of the debris rock glacier would increase the amount of erodible debris and generally reduce mechanical stability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Kneisel & C. Rothenbühler & F. Keller & W. Haeberli, 2007. "Hazard assessment of potential periglacial debris flows based on GIS‐based spatial modelling and geophysical field surveys: a case study in the Swiss Alps," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 259-268, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:259-268
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:259-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.