IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v17y2006i1p13-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geochemistry and source waters of rock glacier outflow, Colorado Front Range

Author

Listed:
  • M. W. Williams
  • M. Knauf
  • N. Caine
  • F. Liu
  • P. L. Verplanck

Abstract

We characterize the seasonal variation in the geochemical and isotopic content of the outflow of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier (RG5), located in the Green Lakes Valley of the Colorado Front Range, USA. Between June and August, the geochemical content of rock glacier outflow does not appear to differ substantially from that of other surface waters in the Green Lakes Valley. Thus, for this alpine ecosystem at this time of year there does not appear to be large differences in water quality among rock glacier outflow, glacier and blockslope discharge, and discharge from small alpine catchments. However, in September concentrations of Mg2+ in the outflow of the rock glacier increased to more than 900 µeq L−1 compared to values of less than 40 µeq L−1 at all the other sites, concentrations of Ca2+ were greater than 4,000 µeq L−1 compared to maximum values of less than 200 µeq L−1 at all other sites, and concentrations of SO 42− reached 7,000 µeq L−1, compared to maximum concentrations below 120 µeq L−1 at the other sites. Inverse geochemical modelling suggests that dissolution of pyrite, epidote, chlorite and minor calcite as well as the precipitation of silica and goethite best explain these elevated concentrations of solutes in the outflow of the rock glacier. Three component hydrograph separation using end–member mixing analysis shows that melted snow comprised an average of 30% of RG5 outflow, soil water 32%, and base flow 38%. Snow was the dominant source water in June, soil water was the dominant water source in July, and base flow was the dominant source in September. Enrichment of δ18O from −10‰ in the outflow of the rock glacier compared to −20‰ in snow and enrichment of deuterium excess from + 17.5‰ in rock glacier outflow compared to + 11‰ in snow, suggests that melt of internal ice that had undergone multiple melt/freeze episodes was the dominant source of base flow. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • M. W. Williams & M. Knauf & N. Caine & F. Liu & P. L. Verplanck, 2006. "Geochemistry and source waters of rock glacier outflow, Colorado Front Range," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 13-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:13-33
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.535
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian Daniel Villarroel & Diana Agostina Ortiz & Ana Paula Forte & Guillermo Tamburini Beliveau & David Ponce & Armando Imhof & Andrés López, 2022. "Internal structure of a large, complex rock glacier and its significance in hydrological and dynamic behavior: A case study in the semi‐arid Andes of Argentina," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 78-95, January.
    2. Dario Trombotto Liaudat & Noelia Sileo & Cristina Dapeña, 2020. "Periglacial water paths within a rock glacier‐dominated catchment in the Stepanek area, Central Andes, Mendoza, Argentina," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 311-323, April.
    3. Michel Paquette & Daniel Fortier & Melissa Lafrenière & Warwick F. Vincent, 2020. "Periglacial slopewash dominated by solute transfers and subsurface erosion on a High Arctic slope," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 472-486, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:13-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.