IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v44y2024i2p61-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exercising bureaucratic discretion through selective bridging: A response to institutional complexity in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Shibaab Rahman
  • Prue Burns
  • Julie Wolfram Cox
  • Quamrul Alam

Abstract

We attempt to reconcile top‐down and bottom‐up perspectives on bureaucratic discretion to understand how actors ‘caught in the middle’, such as middle level public managers, negotiate conflicting demands to exercise discretion in the Bangladesh public administration. To do this, we employ the institutional logics framework, a theoretical lens that conceptualises how regulative, cultural forces bear down on actors, and also acknowledges actor agency. Based on 32 interviews with current and former public servants and local public administration experts, supported by secondary documentary analysis, we identify a new way in which discretion may be enacted in institutionally complex settings, offering a way to reconcile top‐down and bottom‐up perspectives. We term this response selective bridging—a sense‐making approach to exploit the complementarities of competing institutional forces from the top to exercise discretion for bottom‐up needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shibaab Rahman & Prue Burns & Julie Wolfram Cox & Quamrul Alam, 2024. "Exercising bureaucratic discretion through selective bridging: A response to institutional complexity in Bangladesh," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(2), pages 61-74, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:61-74
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.2036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2036
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.2036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:61-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.