IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v40y2020i1p3-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Who, how, and why?

Author

Listed:
  • Darryl S.L. Jarvis
  • Alex Jingwei He

Abstract

In the past three decades, “policy entrepreneurship” has emerged as a key analytical concept helping to explain institutional and policy change. Despite this, however, the literature on policy entrepreneurship remains theoretically vexed, producing limited theoretical knowledge or explanatory models able to draw firm conclusions. Theory building on policy and institutional change, for example, how policy entrepreneurs institute and navigate change agendas, using what tools, strategies, resources, and capacities remains opaque. This is especially the case in developing country contexts, where most analytical investigation of policy entrepreneurship has addressed “first world” case examples. This special issue seeks to address this analytical gap in the literature, focusing on cases specific to developing country contexts, deepening our empirical knowledge of policy entrepreneurship in developing countries, but also exploring theoretical and conceptual debates as they relate to developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Darryl S.L. Jarvis & Alex Jingwei He, 2020. "Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Who, how, and why?," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 3-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:3-10
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.1876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.1876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolaos Zahariadis, 2016. "Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(1), pages 3-12, March.
    2. Paul D. Bush, 1987. "The Theory of Institutional Change," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 1075-1116, September.
    3. Ostrom,Elinor, 2015. "Governing the Commons," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107569782, November.
    4. Scott E. Robinson & Floun'say Caver & Kenneth J. Meier & Laurence J. O'Toole, 2007. "Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 140-150, January.
    5. Zachary Elkins & Beth Simmons, 2005. "On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 33-51, March.
    6. Nikolaos Zahariadis, 2016. "Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(1), pages 3-12, March.
    7. Garrett, Geoffrey & Lange, Peter, 1995. "Internationalization, institutions, and political change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 627-655, October.
    8. Fabrizio Gilardi, 2010. "Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 650-666, July.
    9. Neomi Frisch Aviram & Nissim Cohen & Itai Beeri, 2020. "Policy entrepreneurship in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 35-48, February.
    10. Julius Court & Simon Maxwell, 2005. "Policy entrepreneurship for poverty reduction: bridging research and policy in international development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 713-725.
    11. Paul D. Bush, 1989. "The Concept of “Progressive” Institutional Change and Its Implications for Economic Policy Formation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 455-464, June.
    12. Dimitris Christopoulos & Susanne Vogl, 2015. "The Motivation of Social Entrepreneurs: The Roles, Agendas and Relations of Altruistic Economic Actors," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, March.
    13. Ismael Blanco & Vivien Lowndes & Lawrence Pratchett, 2011. "Policy Networks and Governance Networks: Towards Greater Conceptual Clarity," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 9(3), pages 297-308, September.
    14. Alex Jingwei He & Liang Ma, 2020. "Corporate policy entrepreneurship and cross‐boundary strategies: How a private corporation champions mobile healthcare payment innovation in China?," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 76-86, February.
    15. Douglass C. North, 2008. "Institutions and the Performance of Economies over Time," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 1, pages 21-30, Springer.
    16. Caner Bakir & K. Aydin Gunduz, 2020. "The importance of policy entrepreneurs in developing countries: A systematic review and future research agenda," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 11-34, February.
    17. Fabrizio Gilardi, 2005. "The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 84-101, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sang Hun Lim, 2021. "Welfare state and the social economy in compressed development: Self‐sufficiency organizations in South Korea," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(5), pages 267-278, December.
    2. M. Shamsul Haque, 2020. "Entrepreneurship‐driven public management reforms in Southeast Asia: Critical implications for public accountability," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 220-231, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Yang, 2022. "The fable of policy entrepreneurship? Understanding policy change as an ontological problem with critical realism and institutional theory," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 573-591, September.
    2. Neomi Frisch-Aviram & Nissim Cohen & Itai Beeri, 2018. "Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 39-57, March.
    3. Covadonga Meseguer, 2005. "Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 67-82, March.
    4. Harbi, Sana El & Anderson, Alistair R., 2010. "Institutions and the shaping of different forms of entrepreneurship," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 436-444, June.
    5. Brydie Clarke & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2018. "Understanding Health Promotion Policy Processes: A Study of the Government Adoption of the Achievement Program in Victoria, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Elizabeth A. Koebele, 2021. "When multiple streams make a river: analyzing collaborative policymaking institutions using the multiple streams framework," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 609-628, September.
    7. M. Shamsul Haque, 2020. "Entrepreneurship‐driven public management reforms in Southeast Asia: Critical implications for public accountability," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 220-231, October.
    8. MacCarthaigh Muiris, 2017. "Reforming the Irish public service: A multiple streams perspective," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(2), pages 145-164, May.
    9. Diego Sanjurjo, 2020. "Taking the multiple streams framework for a walk in Latin America," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 205-221, March.
    10. Brian Y. An & Adam Butz & Min-Kyeong Cha & Joshua L. Mitchell, 2023. "Following neighbors or regional leaders? Unpacking the effect of geographic proximity in local climate policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 825-868, December.
    11. Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Why and how does the regulation of emerging technologies occur? Explaining the adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation using the multiple streams framework," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1020-1034, October.
    12. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Kim, Serena Y., 2020. "Institutional arrangements and airport solar PV," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Askarov, Zohid & Doucouliagos, Hristos, 2015. "Spatial aid spillovers during transition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PA), pages 79-95.
    15. Catherine Locatelli & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Post-Print halshs-00631115, HAL.
    16. Gillespie, Stuart & van den Bold, Mara, 2015. "Stories of change in nutrition: A tool pool:," IFPRI discussion papers 1494, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Luigi Romano & Marcello Ruberti, 2019. "Focus on the Performances of the Most Advanced Italian Thermoelectric Power Plants," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 264-273.
    18. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    19. Ismael Blanco, 2013. "Analysing Urban Governance Networks: Bringing Regime Theory Back in," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 276-291, April.
    20. Cassette, Aurélie & Creel, Jérôme & Farvaque, Etienne & Paty, Sonia, 2013. "Governments under influence: Country interactions in discretionary fiscal policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 79-89.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:3-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.