IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v36y2016i1p3-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting or Hindering Aid Effectiveness? An Assessment of Systems for Measuring Donor Agency Results

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Holzapfel

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Holzapfel, 2016. "Boosting or Hindering Aid Effectiveness? An Assessment of Systems for Measuring Donor Agency Results," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(1), pages 3-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:36:y:2016:i:1:p:3-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Susann Stritzke & Carlos Sakyi-Nyarko & Iwona Bisaga & Malcolm Bricknell & Jon Leary & Edward Brown, 2021. "Results-Based Financing (RBF) for Modern Energy Cooking Solutions: An Effective Driver for Innovation and Scale?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-39, July.
    3. Keijzer, Niels & Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2018. "When ‘unintended effects’ reveal hidden intentions: Implications of ‘mutual benefit’ discourses for evaluating development cooperation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 210-217.
    4. Smidt, Lea & Taube, Lena & Polak, Tobias, 2024. "Do aid agencies comply with human rights requirements in Practice? Systematic evidence on the integration of human rights in German development cooperation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Charmaine Williamson & Peet Venter, 2018. "Paradox as a generative practice," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 4(2), pages 162-188.
    6. Rishi Basak & Edwin van der Werf, 2019. "Accountability mechanisms in international climate change financing," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 297-313, June.
    7. Rishi Basak & Sylvia Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen & Katrien J. A. M. Termeer, 2022. "Information for climate finance accountability regimes: Proposed framework and case study of the Green Climate Fund," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(5), pages 261-280, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:36:y:2016:i:1:p:3-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.