IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v35y2015i2p73-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Present and the Future in Government and Governance: Three approaches to Organising Public Action

Author

Listed:
  • Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira
  • Yijia Jing
  • Paul Collins
  • Ian Thynne
  • B. Guy Peters

Abstract

Because public action matters in all countries and political systems, how it is organised now and in the future must exercise the minds of policy‐makers in and beyond government. In response, we argue that there is considerable merit in having a widely applicable analytical lens through which to look at and assess present arrangements and future possibilities. The lens has multiple dimensions, which we address here in terms of three broad approaches to organising public action. We label these approaches as ‘statism’, ‘state–market dualism’ and ‘state–market–civil society synergism’. Their components and distinctive features are discussed, followed by a consideration of significant application issues and concerns. A fundamental matter is how best to balance the demands of public action and organised responses with the requirements of publicness and legitimacy as systems of government and governance are maintained and reformed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira & Yijia Jing & Paul Collins & Ian Thynne & B. Guy Peters, 2015. "Addressing the Present and the Future in Government and Governance: Three approaches to Organising Public Action," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 73-85, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:35:y:2015:i:2:p:73-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashley Fox & Jennie R. Law & Keith Baker, 2022. "The case for metagovernance: The promises and pitfalls of multisectoral nutrition service delivery structures in low‐ and middle‐income countries," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2), pages 128-141, May.
    2. Yali Lu & Chenyang Zhao & Leimeng Xu & Lei Shen, 2018. "Dual Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Supply Chain Practice and Performance Outcome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Johannes Klein & Sirkku Juhola & Mia Landauer, 2017. "Local authorities and the engagement of private actors in climate change adaptation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1055-1074, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:35:y:2015:i:2:p:73-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.