IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v33y2013i4p320-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Accumulation In Asian Public Administration Research: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • M. Shamsul Haque
  • Mark Turner
  • Kilkon Ko

Abstract

SUMMARY Given the growing controversy over the relevance of Anglo‐Saxon style public administration to developing countries and a greater demand for more context‐relevant theories of public administration in Asia, we should expect that Asian scholars achieve a certain level of knowledge growth in line with this controversy and demand. On the basis of the review of 8810 articles published in nine major international journals during 1990–2011, the author found that the number of articles on Asian public administration is very small, and there is no strong pattern of growth in this regard. In addition, there are very few studies adopting a comparative approach covering multiple Asian countries. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Shamsul Haque & Mark Turner & Kilkon Ko, 2013. "Knowledge Accumulation In Asian Public Administration Research: A Critical Review," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(4), pages 320-324, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:33:y:2013:i:4:p:320-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. & Fra.Paleo, Urbano, 2016. "Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 543-551.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:33:y:2013:i:4:p:320-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.