IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i3p629-638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving self‐care efficacy and quality of life with a self‐management program among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A quasi‐experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Huey‐Ling Liou
  • Yu‐Tai Huang
  • Zi‐Yi Lai
  • Yin‐Yin Tsou
  • Ya‐Chi Tsai
  • Hsiao‐Hui Yu
  • Mei‐shuang Chen

Abstract

Self‐management helps patients understand their illnesses and learn about disease‐related skills so they can better manage their situation. However, published studies on the effectiveness of self‐management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are heterogeneous. Quasi‐experimental design was used to investigate the effectiveness of a self‐management program in self‐care efficacy and quality of life in patients with COPD. Sixty participants who had experienced COPD were assigned to control group (usual care) or experimental group (self‐care program) (1:1 ratio) according to a purposeful sampling at a Medical Center in Taiwan. The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the COPD Self‐Efficacy Scale, the Clinical COPD Questionnaire were used to analyze data. The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale was more significant improvement in the 2 months after discharge in the experimental group than in the control group. The COPD Self‐Efficacy Scale and Clinical COPD Questionnaire scores in the experimental group within 3 months after discharge were significantly improved compared with the control group. These findings demonstrate the application and initial effect of this self‐management program.

Suggested Citation

  • Huey‐Ling Liou & Yu‐Tai Huang & Zi‐Yi Lai & Yin‐Yin Tsou & Ya‐Chi Tsai & Hsiao‐Hui Yu & Mei‐shuang Chen, 2020. "Improving self‐care efficacy and quality of life with a self‐management program among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A quasi‐experimental study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 629-638, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:629-638
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12703
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:629-638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.