IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i3p557-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Title analysis of (systematic) scoping review studies: Chaos or consistency?

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Chrastina

Abstract

The scoping review is one of the alternatives of producing a literature review. However, this approach still lacks a clearly accepted definition, and the scoping terminology is also somewhat fuzzy. Although the methodology of scoping review processing is relatively uniform, terminological chaos appears in the titles of studies with scoping review methodology. This paper presents an analysis of selected published studies with a focus on the content of their titles. A total of 13 thematic dimensions were identified covering the content of titles that show a degree of inconsistency and frequent terminological and methodological “chaos.” This study includes a broad scope of themes and areas for which scoping reviews were produced. We would like to recommend to authors (especially scoping review beginners) to – if not necessary or desirable – avoid introducing new concepts and specifications of titles of produced and published scoping review studies. In the case of literature reviews and knowledge synthesis it is necessary to search according to specific keywords and search phrases – more fragmented scoping review terminology makes literature search more difficult or even impossible.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Chrastina, 2020. "Title analysis of (systematic) scoping review studies: Chaos or consistency?," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 557-562, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:557-562
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hudson, 2016. "An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 871-889, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    2. Michael Dowling & Helmi Hammami & Dima Tawil & Ousayna Zreik, 2021. "Writing Energy Economics Research for Impact," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(3), pages 55-70, May.
    3. Qianjin Zong & Yafen Xie & Rongchan Tuo & Jingshi Huang & Yang Yang, 2019. "The impact of video abstract on citation counts: evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(3), pages 1715-1727, June.
    4. T. Liskiewicz & G. Liskiewicz & J. Paczesny, 2021. "Factors affecting the citations of papers in tribology journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3321-3336, April.
    5. Lu, Wei & Liu, Zhifeng & Huang, Yong & Bu, Yi & Li, Xin & Cheng, Qikai, 2020. "How do authors select keywords? A preliminary study of author keyword selection behavior," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    6. Mike Thelwall, 2017. "Avoiding obscure topics and generalising findings produces higher impact research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 307-320, January.
    7. Alison Y. Tang & Jung Kwak & Lu Xiao & Bo Xie & Sucheta Lahiri & Olivia Aiden Flynn & Abinav Murugadass, 2023. "Online Health Information Wants of Caregivers for Persons With Dementia in Social Media," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:557-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.