IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v19y2017i2p250-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the effectiveness of two different interventions to reduce preoperative anxiety: A randomized controlled study

Author

Listed:
  • Nurcan Ertuğ
  • Özge Ulusoylu
  • Ayça Bal
  • Hazal Özgür

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine and compare the effectiveness of nature sounds and relaxation exercises for reducing preoperative anxiety. A repeated measures randomized controlled trial design was used. We divided 159 preoperative patients into three groups: nature sounds (n = 53), relaxation exercises (n = 53), and control groups (n = 53). We evaluated anxiety using the visual analog scale and state anxiety inventory scores immediately before, immediately after, and 30 min after interventions in nature sounds and relaxation exercises groups, and silent rest in the control. We found no differences between the measurement values in the intervention groups, but we did observe a difference between the intervention and control groups. The two interventions were similarly effective in reducing preoperative anxiety. These simple and low‐cost interventions can be used to reduce preoperative anxiety in surgical clinics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurcan Ertuğ & Özge Ulusoylu & Ayça Bal & Hazal Özgür, 2017. "Comparison of the effectiveness of two different interventions to reduce preoperative anxiety: A randomized controlled study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 250-256, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:19:y:2017:i:2:p:250-256
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rujadhorn Indratula & Achara Sukonthasarn & Chawapornpan Chanprasit & Suparat Wangsrikhun, 2013. "Experiences of Thai individuals awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 474-479, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Sampaio & Patrícia Gonçalves & Vítor Parola & Carlos Sequeira & Teresa Lluch Canut, 2021. "Nursing Process Addressing the Focus “Anxiety†: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(7), pages 1001-1011, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:19:y:2017:i:2:p:250-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.