IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v17y2015i4p492-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too much knowledge for a nurse? Use of physical assessment by final‐semester nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Clint Douglas
  • Carol Windsor
  • Peter Lewis

Abstract

There is debate around the scope of physical assessment skills that should be taught in undergraduate nursing programs. Yet this debate is largely uninformed by evidence on what is learned and practiced by nursing students. This study examined the pattern and correlates of physical assessment skill utilization by 208 graduating nursing students at an Australian university, including measures of knowledge, frequency of use, and perceived barriers to physical assessment skills during clinical practice. Of the 126 skills surveyed, on average, only five were used every time students practiced. Core skills reflected inspection or general observation of the patient; none involved complex palpation, percussion, or auscultation. Skill utilization was also shaped by specialty area. Most skills (70%) were, on average, never performed or learned and students perceived nursing physical assessment was marginalized in both university and workplace contexts. Lack of confidence was, thus, a significant barrier to use of skills. Based on these findings, we argue that the current debate must shift to how we might best support students to integrate comprehensive physical assessment into nursing practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Clint Douglas & Carol Windsor & Peter Lewis, 2015. "Too much knowledge for a nurse? Use of physical assessment by final‐semester nursing students," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 492-499, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:492-499
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina Lavareda Baixinho & Óscar Ferreira & Marcelo Medeiros & Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira, 2022. "From Evidence Synthesis to Transfer: Results from a Qualitative Case Study with the Perspectives of Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:492-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.