IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v16y2014i1p11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the predictive validity of an emergency department mental health triage tool

Author

Listed:
  • Natisha Sands
  • Stephen Elsom
  • Michael Berk
  • Jennifer Hosking
  • Roshani Prematunga
  • Marie Gerdtz

Abstract

Emergency department mental health triage is a complex clinical task for which the evidence base is minimal. Research in the past decade has consistently identified issues associated with the accuracy and consistency of mental health triage assessment. In this study, we investigated the predictive validity of the clinical descriptors in the Victorian Emergency Department Mental Health Triage Tool. Using a naturalistic, retrospective study design, an audit of the emergency department triage database was undertaken on 12 months of continuous data for all mental health presentations (n = 1718). The main outcome measure was urgency categorization. The study findings indicate that triage nurses can accurately identify the urgency of mental health presentations using defined clinical criteria. A significant finding was that patients with acute psychotic symptoms were more likely to be triaged as high urgency (code 2); however, the Australasian Triage Scale, in use in all Australian and many international emergency departments, provides no mental health‐specific descriptors in high‐urgency categories (1 and 2).

Suggested Citation

  • Natisha Sands & Stephen Elsom & Michael Berk & Jennifer Hosking & Roshani Prematunga & Marie Gerdtz, 2014. "Investigating the predictive validity of an emergency department mental health triage tool," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 11-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.