Author
Abstract
The Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale measures readiness for self‐directed learning among undergraduate healthcare students. While several exploratory factor analyses and one confirmatory factor analysis have examined the psychometric properties of the Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale, questions have been raised regarding the underlying latent constructs being measured. The objective of this study was to determine the best‐fitting Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale factorial structure among three models published in the literature. Data from the three‐factor 40‐item Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale completed by 233 undergraduate paramedic students from four Australian universities (response rate of 26%) were analyzed using maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Comparison of model fit from the 40‐item version was undertaken with the previously documented four‐factor 36‐item and three‐factor 29‐item Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scales. The model fit indices of the three one‐factor congeneric models with maximum likelihood analysis demonstrate that the 40‐item Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale does not fit the data well. The best fitting model was the four‐factor 36‐item Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale followed by the three‐factor 29‐item models. The confirmatory factor analysis results did not support the overall construct validity of the original 40‐item Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale.
Suggested Citation
Brett Williams & Ted Brown, 2013.
"A confirmatory factor analysis of the Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale,"
Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 430-436, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:430-436
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12046
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:430-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.