IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v62y2015i4p304-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing and inventory management during new product introduction when shortage creates hype

Author

Listed:
  • Prashant Chintapalli
  • Jishnu Hazra

Abstract

In this study, we analyze the joint pricing and inventory management during new product introduction when product shortage creates additional demand due to hype. We develop a two‐period model in which a firm launches its product at the beginning of the first period, before it observes sales in the two periods. The product is successful with an exogenous probability, or unsuccessful with the complementary probability. The hype in the second period is observed only when the product is successful. The firm learns the actual status of the product only after observing the first‐period demand. The firm must decide the stocking level and price of the product jointly at the beginning of each of the two periods. In this article, we derive some structural properties of the optimal prices and inventory levels, and show that (i) firms do not always exploit hype, (ii) firms do not always increase the price of a successful product in the second period, (iii) firms may price out an unsuccessful product in the first period if the success probability is above a threshold, and (iv) such a threshold probability is decreasing in the first‐period market potential of the successful product. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 62: 304–320, 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Prashant Chintapalli & Jishnu Hazra, 2015. "Pricing and inventory management during new product introduction when shortage creates hype," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 304-320, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:4:p:304-320
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21629
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Maqbool Dada, 1999. "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 183-194, April.
    2. Necati Tereyagoglu & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2012. "Selling to Conspicuous Consumers: Pricing, Production, and Sourcing Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2168-2189, December.
    3. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2014. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Management Under Inventory-Dependent Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1077-1094, October.
    4. Yigal Gerchak & Yunzeng Wang, 1994. "Periodic‐review inventory models with inventory‐level‐dependent demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 99-116, February.
    5. Kutsal Doğan & Yonghua Ji & Vijay S. Mookerjee & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2011. "Managing the Versions of a Software Product Under Variable and Endogenous Demand," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 5-21, March.
    6. Cuihong Li & Laurens G. Debo, 2009. "Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 448-470, July.
    7. James D. Dana, Jr. & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2001. "Note: The Newsvendor Model with Endogenous Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1488-1497, November.
    8. Urban, Timothy L., 2005. "Inventory models with inventory-level-dependent demand: A comprehensive review and unifying theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 792-804, May.
    9. repec:bla:kyklos:v:48:y:1995:i:3:p:369-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Amar Sapra & Van-Anh Truong & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2010. "How Much Demand Should Be Fulfilled?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 719-733, June.
    11. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Michael S. Pangburn & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2004. ""Stack Them High, Let 'em Fly": Lot-Sizing Policies When Inventories Stimulate Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 630-644, May.
    12. Verhallen, Theo M. M. & Robben, Henry S. J., 1994. "Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 315-331, June.
    13. Patrick DeGraba, 1995. "Buying Frenzies and Seller-Induced Excess Demand," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 26(2), pages 331-342, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youhua (Frank) Chen & Ye Lu & Minghui Xu, 2012. "Optimal inventory control policy for periodic‐review inventory systems with inventory‐level‐dependent demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(6), pages 430-440, September.
    2. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2014. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Management Under Inventory-Dependent Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1077-1094, October.
    3. Yan, Xiaoming & Chao, Xiuli & Lu, Ye, 2024. "Optimal control policies for dynamic inventory systems with service level dependent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 935-949.
    4. Gérard P. Cachon & Santiago Gallino & Marcelo Olivares, 2019. "Does Adding Inventory Increase Sales? Evidence of a Scarcity Effect in U.S. Automobile Dealerships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1469-1485, April.
    5. Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2017. "Augmented nested sampling for stochastic programs with recourse and endogenous uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 613-627, December.
    6. Chuang, Chia-Hung & Zhao, Yabing, 2019. "Demand stimulation in finished-goods inventory management: Empirical evidence from General Motors dealerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 208-220.
    7. Mohammad Saffari, 2022. "Periodic inventory management when demand stochastically depends on shelf-stock," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1489-1501, December.
    8. Gérard P. Cachon & A. Gürhan Kök, 2007. "Implementation of the Newsvendor Model with Clearance Pricing: How to (and How Not to) Estimate a Salvage Value," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 276-290, October.
    9. Boutselis, Petros & McNaught, Ken, 2014. "Finite-Time Horizon Logistics Decision Making Problems: Consideration of a Wider Set of Factors," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Current Issues and Emerging Practices. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferenc, volume 19, pages 249-274, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    10. Mandal, Prasenjit & Kaul, Rupali & Jain, Tarun, 2018. "Stocking and pricing decisions under endogenous demand and reference point effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 181-199.
    11. Yuan Jiang & Xu Guan & Yao Tang & Simiao Chen, 2022. "Strategic stocking for new products to signal quality information," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 65-83, January.
    12. Aydinliyim, Tolga & Pangburn, Michael S. & Rabinovich, Elliot, 2017. "Inventory disclosure in online retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 195-204.
    13. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Michael S. Pangburn & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2008. "Integrating the Promotional and Service Roles of Retail Inventories," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 218-235, July.
    14. Chang Hwan Lee & Tsan‐Ming Choi & T.C.E. Cheng, 2015. "Selling to strategic and loss‐averse consumers: Stocking, procurement, and product design policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(6), pages 435-453, September.
    15. Qin, Yan & Wang, Ruoxuan & Vakharia, Asoo J. & Chen, Yuwen & Seref, Michelle M.H., 2011. "The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 361-374, September.
    16. Ruomeng Cui & Dennis J. Zhang & Achal Bassamboo, 2019. "Learning from Inventory Availability Information: Evidence from Field Experiments on Amazon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1216-1235, March.
    17. Vishal Gaur & Young-Hoon Park, 2007. "Asymmetric Consumer Learning and Inventory Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 227-240, February.
    18. Soonhui Lee & Tito Homem-de-Mello & Anton Kleywegt, 2012. "Newsvendor-type models with decision-dependent uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 76(2), pages 189-221, October.
    19. Çerağ Pinçe & Mark Ferguson & Beril Toktay, 2016. "Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, October.
    20. Pol Boada-Collado & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Estimating and Optimizing the Impact of Inventory on Consumer Choices in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 582-597, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:4:p:304-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.