IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v53y2006i6p508-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replicated batch means for steady‐state simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Nilay Tanık Argon
  • Sigrún Andradóttir

Abstract

This paper studies a new steady‐state simulation output analysis method called replicated batch means in which a small number of replications are conducted and the observations in these replications are grouped into batches. This paper also introduces and compares methods for selecting the initial state of each replication. More specifically, we show that confidence intervals constructed by the replicated batch means method are valid for large batch sizes and derive expressions for the expected values and variances of the steady‐state mean and variance estimators for stationary processes and large sample sizes. We then use these expressions, analytical examples, and numerical experiments to compare the replicated batch means method with the standard batch means and multiple replications methods. The numerical results, which are obtained from an AR(1) process and a small, nearly‐decomposable Markov chain, show that the multiple replications method often gives confidence intervals with poorer coverage than the standard and replicated batch means methods and that the replicated batch means method, implemented with good choices of initialization method and number of replications, provides confidence interval coverages that range from being comparable with to being noticeably better than coverages obtained by the standard batch means method. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Nilay Tanık Argon & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2006. "Replicated batch means for steady‐state simulations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(6), pages 508-524, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:6:p:508-524
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. David Kelton & Averill M. Law, 1984. "An Analytical Evaluation of Alternative Strategies in Steady-State Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 169-184, February.
    2. Robert S. Sargent & Keebom Kang & David Goldsman, 1992. "An Investigation of Finite-Sample Behavior of Confidence Interval Estimators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 898-913, October.
    3. Peter W. Glynn & Donald L. Iglehart, 1990. "Simulation Output Analysis Using Standardized Time Series," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Ward Whitt, 1991. "The Efficiency of One Long Run Versus Independent Replications in Steady-State Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 645-666, June.
    5. David F. Muñoz & Peter W. Glynn, 1997. "A Batch Means Methodology for Estimation of a Nonlinear Function of a Steady-State Mean," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1121-1135, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nilay Tanık Argon & Sigrún Andradóttir & Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman, 2013. "Steady-State Simulation with Replication-Dependent Initial Transients: Analysis and Examples," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 177-191, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vandin, Andrea & Giachini, Daniele & Lamperti, Francesco & Chiaromonte, Francesca, 2022. "Automated and distributed statistical analysis of economic agent-based models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Gamze Tokol & David Goldsman & Daniel H. Ockerman & James J. Swain, 1998. "Standardized Time Series Lp-Norm Variance Estimators for Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 234-245, February.
    3. Andrea Vandin & Daniele Giachini & Francesco Lamperti & Francesca Chiaromonte, 2021. "Automated and Distributed Statistical Analysis of Economic Agent-Based Models," Papers 2102.05405, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    4. Seong-Hee Kim & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "On the Asymptotic Validity of Fully Sequential Selection Procedures for Steady-State Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 475-488, June.
    5. Natalie M. Steiger & James R. Wilson, 2001. "Convergence Properties of the Batch Means Method for Simulation Output Analysis," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 277-293, November.
    6. David Goldsman & Keebom Kang & Andrew F. Seila, 1999. "Cramér-von Mises Variance Estimators for Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 299-309, April.
    7. Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman & Gamze Tokol, 2001. "Properties of Batched Quadratic-Form Variance Parameter Estimators for Simulations," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 149-156, May.
    8. Andrea Vandin & Daniele Giachini & Francesco Lamperti & Francesca Chiaromonte, 2020. "Automated and Distributed Statistical Analysis of Economic Agent-Based Models," LEM Papers Series 2020/31, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    9. Nilay Tanık Argon & Sigrún Andradóttir & Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman, 2013. "Steady-State Simulation with Replication-Dependent Initial Transients: Analysis and Examples," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 177-191, February.
    10. Bhattacharya, Sourabh, 2008. "Consistent estimation of the accuracy of importance sampling using regenerative simulation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2522-2527, October.
    11. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2013. "Robust Portfolio Control with Stochastic Factor Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 874-893, August.
    12. Song, Wheyming Tina & Chih, Mingchang, 2013. "Run length not required: Optimal-mse dynamic batch means estimators for steady-state simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 114-123.
    13. Halkos, George & Kevork, Ilias, 2002. "Confidence intervals in stationary autocorrelated time series," MPRA Paper 31840, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sheth-Voss, Pieter A. & Willemain, Thomas R. & Haddock, Jorge, 2005. "Estimating the steady-state mean from short transient simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 403-417, April.
    15. Tûba Aktaran‐Kalaycı & Christos Alexopoulos & Nilay Tanık Argon & David Goldsman & James R. Wilson, 2007. "Exact expected values of variance estimators for simulation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 397-410, June.
    16. Crawford, J. W. & Gallwey, T. J., 2000. "Bias and variance reduction in computer simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 571-590, August.
    17. Halkos, George & Kevork, Ilias, 2006. "Estimating population means in covariance stationary process," MPRA Paper 31843, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jacobson, Sheldon H., 1997. "The effect of initial transient on the steady-state simulation harmonic analysis gradient estimators," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 209-221.
    19. Nakayama, Marvin K., 2007. "Fixed-width multiple-comparison procedures using common random numbers for steady-state simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1330-1349, November.
    20. David F. Muñoz & Peter W. Glynn, 2001. "Multivariate Standardized Time Series for Steady-State Simulation Output Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 413-422, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:53:y:2006:i:6:p:508-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.