IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v52y2005i1p30-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and analyzing multiple station baggage screening security system performance

Author

Listed:
  • Sheldon H. Jacobson
  • Laura A. McLay
  • John E. Kobza
  • Jon M. Bowman

Abstract

In the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001, numerous changes have been made to aviation security policy and operations throughout the nation's airports. The allocation and utilization of checked baggage screening devices is a critical component in aviation security systems. This paper formulates problems that model multiple sets of flights originating from multiple stations (e.g., airports, terminals), where the objective is to optimize a baggage screening performance measure subject to a finite amount of resources. These measures include uncovered flight segments (UFS) and uncovered passenger segments (UPS). Three types of multiple station security problems are identified and their computational complexity is established. The problems are illustrated on two examples that use data extracted from the Official Airline Guide. The examples indicate that the problems can provide widely varying solutions based on the type of performance measure used and the restrictions imposed by the security device allocations. Moreover, the examples suggest that the allocations based on the UFS measure also provide reasonable solutions with respect to the UPS measure; however, the reverse may not be the case. This suggests that the UFS measure may provide more robust screening device allocations. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheldon H. Jacobson & Laura A. McLay & John E. Kobza & Jon M. Bowman, 2005. "Modeling and analyzing multiple station baggage screening security system performance," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 30-45, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:52:y:2005:i:1:p:30-45
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nie, Xiaofeng, 2019. "The impact of conditional dependence on checked baggage screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 883-893.
    2. Aniruddha Bagchi & Jomon Aliyas Paul, 2014. "Optimal Allocation of Resources in Airport Security: Profiling vs. Screening," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 219-233, April.
    3. Laura A. McLay & Sheldon H. Jacobson & John E. Kobza, 2006. "A multilevel passenger screening problem for aviation security," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 183-197, April.
    4. Laura A. McLay & Adrian J. Lee & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2010. "Risk-Based Policies for Airport Security Checkpoint Screening," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 333-349, August.
    5. Alexander G. Nikolaev & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Laura A. McLay, 2007. "A Sequential Stochastic Security System Design Problem for Aviation Security," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 182-194, May.
    6. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    7. Kyle Y. Lin & Moshe Kress & Roberto Szechtman, 2009. "Scheduling policies for an antiterrorist surveillance system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 113-126, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:52:y:2005:i:1:p:30-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.