IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v43y1996i2p159-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal control of continuous‐time terminal‐value birth‐and‐death processes and airline overbooking

Author

Listed:
  • Richard E. Chatwin

Abstract

Consider a continuous‐time airline overbooking problem that relates to a single‐leg flight and a single service class with a stationary fare. Passengers may cancel their reservations at any time and receive a full refund. Therefore fares can be thought of as being paid at flight time. At that time, the airline bumps passengers in excess of flight capacity and pays a penalty for so doing. The wflight‐time revenue, that is, fares received less bumping penalties paid, is quasiconcave in the number of reservations at that time. We model the reservations process as a continuous‐time terminal‐value birth‐and‐death process. A more general model than is necessary for an airline reservations system is considered, in which the airline controls both the reservation acceptance (birth) and the cancellation (death) rates. In current practice airlines do not control cancellation rates (though other industries do exercise such control, e.g., hotels) and control reservation acceptance rates by declining reservation requests. The more general model might be applied to other targeting applications, such as steering a vehicle through space toward a target location. For the general model a piecewise‐constant booking‐limit policy is optimal; that is, at all times the airline accepts reservation requests up to a booking limit if the current number of reservations is less than that booking limit, and declines reservation requests otherwise. When the airline is allowed to decline all reservation requests, as is the case in practice, the booking‐limit optimal policy defined by using the greatest optimal booking limit at all times is piecewise constant. Moreover, these booking limits fall toward flight time. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard E. Chatwin, 1996. "Optimal control of continuous‐time terminal‐value birth‐and‐death processes and airline overbooking," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 159-168, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:159-168
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199603)43:23.0.CO;2-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199603)43:23.0.CO;2-9
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199603)43:23.0.CO;2-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark R. Lembersky, 1974. "Preferred Rules in Continuous Time Markov Decision Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 348-357, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. B. G. Frenk & Behrooz Pourghannad & Semih O. Sezer, 2017. "A Static Model in Single Leg Flight Airline Revenue Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 214-232, February.
    2. Richard E. Chatwin, 1999. "Continuous-Time Airline Overbooking with Time-Dependent Fares and Refunds," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 182-191, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:159-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.