Author
Listed:
- Ralph E. Johnson
- Ernst K. Isensee
- William T. Allison
Abstract
The concepts evaluation model (CEM) is a computer simulation model of ground and air warfare operations that is used by the U.S. Army Concepts Analysis Agency (CAA) to conduct analysis of the capabilities and requirements of forces engaged in warfare at theater level. The CEM has been applied to campaign analyses for numerous scenarios since the early 1970s, including Central Europe, Korea, Iran, and Iraq theaters of operation. The standard CEM is fully automated and deterministic, yielding a single outcome for any situation simulated, providing no confidence intervals, range, nor distribution of possible outcomes. Modern, faster computers have now reduced CEM execution time to a level that makes multiple replications of the CEM feasible. In this project a stochastic version of the CEM has been developed that makes use of individual replications of stochastic attrition input data, rather than averaged sample data, and that simulates commanders' decisions, the disposition of casualties and of combat‐damaged vehicles, and certain other functions based on statistical distributions rather than on expected values. This article reports the methodology and results of an analysis of this stochastic version of CEM, indicating which stochastic features most influenced the variability among replications of one simulated campaign and outlining costs and benefits of using a stochastic version of the CEM. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
Suggested Citation
Ralph E. Johnson & Ernst K. Isensee & William T. Allison, 1995.
"A stochastic version of the concepts evaluation model (CEM),"
Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 233-246, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:navres:v:42:y:1995:i:2:p:233-246
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199503)42:23.0.CO;2-G
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:42:y:1995:i:2:p:233-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.