IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v40y1993i6p755-768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An indicator of combat success

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Barr
  • Maurice Weir
  • James Hoffman

Abstract

Assessing the effects of changes in weapons systems or battle tactics is difficult because of the variations in battles and the resulting instability of measures of combat effectiveness. Even under the relatively stable conditions of designed combat exercises, traditional measures may fail to reflect important battle events and dynamics. This variation in results makes the design, conduct, and evaluation of combat experiments, combat simulations, and combat training exercises a challenging endeavor, indeed. We develop and examine a combat measure of effectiveness, based on Lanchester models, which we call the battle trace. The battle trace is a measure of ongoing battle results, measured as a function of time into the battle. We describe how such measures might contribute to assessing effects of changing certain battle parameters. We suggest applications of these ideas to developing combat simulations and to enhancing combat training exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Barr & Maurice Weir & James Hoffman, 1993. "An indicator of combat success," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 755-768, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:6:p:755-768
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199310)40:63.0.CO;2-L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199310)40:63.0.CO;2-L
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199310)40:63.0.CO;2-L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. J. Ancker & A. V. Gafarian, 1988. "Erratum. The validity of assumptions underlying current uses of lanchester attrition rates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 534-534, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. V. Gafarian & K. R. Manion, 1989. "Some two‐on‐two homogeneous stochastic combats," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(6), pages 721-764, December.
    2. C. J. Ancker, 1995. "A proposed foundation for a theory of combat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 311-343, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:6:p:755-768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.