IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v36y1989i5p675-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining restrictive goals in linear goal programs

Author

Listed:
  • Philip O. Beck
  • Gary Klein

Abstract

Goal programming is a method for solving problems having multiple, conflicting objectives. Information on the characteristics of the goals can help in setting goal weights and levels, determining priority levels, and in conducting postoptimality analysis. One characteristic affecting the outcome of a goal program is the restrictiveness of a goal. A restrictive goal is one whose inclusion in the goal set most degrades the value of the total objective function, or the attainment of the remaining goals. An algorithm is presented that determines restrictive goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip O. Beck & Gary Klein, 1989. "Determining restrictive goals in linear goal programs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 675-682, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:36:y:1989:i:5:p:675-682
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(198910)36:53.0.CO;2-P
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(198910)36:53.0.CO;2-P
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(198910)36:53.0.CO;2-P?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald L. Keefer & Stephen M. Pollock, 1980. "Approximations and Sensitivity in Multiobjective Resource Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 114-128, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenbloom, E. S., 1997. "A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 371-378, January.
    2. Jesse Daniels & Paul W. Werner & A. Terry Bahill, 2001. "Quantitative methods for tradeoff analyses," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 190-212.
    3. Peter H. Farquhar & Yutaka Nakamura, 1988. "Utility assessment procedures for polynomial‐exponential functions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 597-613, December.
    4. Terry P. Harrison & Richard E. Rosenthal, 1988. "Optimizability of utility and value functions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 411-418, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:36:y:1989:i:5:p:675-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.