IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v20y1973i4p793-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling with parallel processors and linear delay costs

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth R. Baker
  • Alan G. Merten

Abstract

This paper deals with the sequencing problem of minimizing linear delay costs with parallel identical processors. The theoretical properties of this m‐machine problem are explored, and the problem of determining an optimum scheduling procedure is examined. Properties of the optimum schedule are given as well as the corresponding reductions in the number of schedules that must be evaluated in the search for an optimum. An experimental comparison of scheduling rules is reported; this indicates that although a class of effective heuristics can be identified, their relative behavior is difficult to characterize.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth R. Baker & Alan G. Merten, 1973. "Scheduling with parallel processors and linear delay costs," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 793-804, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:4:p:793-804
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800200417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800200417
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800200417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnny C. Ho & Yih‐Long Chang, 1991. "Heuristics for minimizing mean tardiness for m parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 367-381, June.
    2. Hongmin Li & Woonghee T. Huh & Matheus C. Sampaio & Naiping Keng, 2021. "Planning Production and Equipment Qualification under High Process Flexibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3369-3390, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:4:p:793-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.