IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v20y1973i1p181-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cost analysis of sampling inspection under Military Standard 105D

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald G. Brown
  • Herbert C. Rutemiller

Abstract

Military Standard 105D has been almost universally adopted by government and private consumers for the lot‐by‐lot sampling inspection of product which may be inspected on a dichotomoun basis The plan specifies, for each lot size, a random sample size and set of acceptance numbers (maximum allowable number of defectives in each sample). The acceptance numbers are based upon the binomial distribution and depend upon the quality required by the purchaser. Where several consecutive lots are submitted, a shift to less severe (“reduced”) inspection or more severe (“tightened”) inspection is specified when the ongoing quality is very high or low. Further experience permits a return to normal sampling from either of these states This paper examines the long range costs of such a sampling scheme. The three inspection types are considered as three distinct Markov chains, with periodic transitions from chain to chain. The expected sample size and the expected proportion of rejected product are determined as a function of the two parameters under control of the manufacturer, lot size and product quality. Some numerical examples are given which illustrate how to compute the overall cost of sampling inspection. Suggestions are made concerning the choice of parameters to minimize this cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald G. Brown & Herbert C. Rutemiller, 1973. "A cost analysis of sampling inspection under Military Standard 105D," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 181-199, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:1:p:181-199
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800200115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800200115
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800200115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:1:p:181-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.