IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v18y1971i4p531-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of standard tables to obtain Dodge‐Romig LTPD sampling inspection plans

Author

Listed:
  • William C. Guenther

Abstract

Procedures are described which yield single and double sample Dodge‐Romig [1] lot tolerance percent defective (LTPD) rectifying inspection plans. For the determination of such plans only a desk calculator and standard tables of the discrete probability distributions are required. Some advantages gained by using these procedures rather than the Dodge‐Romig table include: (a) The Consumer's Risk is not limited to 0.10. (b) More choices of LTPD are available. (c) Smaller average total inspection is achieved by using a plan designed for specific “process average” and lot size rather than a compromise plan designed to cover intervals on these two parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • William C. Guenther, 1971. "On the use of standard tables to obtain Dodge‐Romig LTPD sampling inspection plans," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 531-542, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:18:y:1971:i:4:p:531-542
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800180413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800180413
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800180413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:18:y:1971:i:4:p:531-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.