IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v48y2024i3p941-961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the forestland‐tenure disputes on the new type of forestry operating entity's long‐term investment: The intermediary effects on credit constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Xiao
  • Fangmiao Hou
  • Xiaoyi Li
  • Zhuoran Wei
  • Chengliang Wu

Abstract

In the context of the state's proposal to accelerate the development of new type of forestry operating entities in rural area, we provide an analysis of how forestland‐tenure disputes affect the long‐term investment behavior through credit constraints based on the perspective of forestland‐tenure disputes. Based on the survey data of 485 new type of forestry operating entities in nine provinces across China, the empirical analysis is conducted using the Tobit model and mediating effect model, while paying attention to the heterogeneity of management scale and different entity types on the impact of new type of forestry operating entity's long‐term investment behavior. The conclusions are as follows: both forestland‐tenure disputes and dispute areas have a significant negative impact on the new type of forestry operating entity's long‐term investment. In addition, forestland‐tenure disputes not only have a direct negative impact on the long‐term investment but also have an indirect negative impact on the long‐term investment by constraining the new type of forestry operating entity's bank loan and expanding the loan gap. It is suggested to improve the forestland trading market, regulate the order of trading, and implement the policy of forest tenure mortgage to provide stable policy guarantee and external conditions for fully activating the vitality of forestland management.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Xiao & Fangmiao Hou & Xiaoyi Li & Zhuoran Wei & Chengliang Wu, 2024. "The impact of the forestland‐tenure disputes on the new type of forestry operating entity's long‐term investment: The intermediary effects on credit constraints," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(3), pages 941-961, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:48:y:2024:i:3:p:941-961
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12394
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.12394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:48:y:2024:i:3:p:941-961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.