IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i3p1520-1534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of Reward Tiers in Crowdfunding: Eschewing Acknowledgments and Prioritizing Promotion

Author

Listed:
  • Liangchen Fan
  • Jin Qin
  • Yao Yao

Abstract

This study investigates how reward tier design impacts crowdfunding performance. We innovatively categorize reward tiers into three utilitarian types—basic, promotional, and one‐dollar—and we consider hedonic acknowledgments of types public and personal. By analyzing data from 2471 Kickstarter projects (with 20,183 tiers), we find an inverted U‐shaped relationship between the number of promotional tiers and fundraising performance. In contrast, offering more basic tiers or having a one‐dollar tier hinders fundraising. Counterintuitively, neither public nor personal acknowledgments in reward tiers are positively related to the fundraising performance. These new insights provide guidance for practice in crowdfunding.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangchen Fan & Jin Qin & Yao Yao, 2025. "Design of Reward Tiers in Crowdfunding: Eschewing Acknowledgments and Prioritizing Promotion," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1520-1534, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1520-1534
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1520-1534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.