IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i1p515-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tripartite evolutionary game and simulation of solvency supervision under C‐ROSS II based on prospect theory

Author

Listed:
  • Shilong Li
  • Zhijie Tong

Abstract

This paper focuses on the implementation of “C‐ROSS II” and utilizes an evolutionary game model to investigate regulatory issues. Based on prospect theory, a three‐party evolutionary game model is constructed among regulatory agencies, insurance companies, and consumers with incomplete rationality, examining evolutionary stability strategies. Meanwhile, considering the different attitudes of policyholders in the face of loss and return, the heterogeneous risk preference is analyzed by changing the prospect parameters. The results show that increases in penalty amounts, positive incentives, and consumer sensitivity to losses will promote the evolution of the system to the optimal stable equilibrium point. However, rises in brand incomes and rectification costs, as well as decreases in capital costs, will decrease the probability of regulatory authorities enforcing strict supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilong Li & Zhijie Tong, 2025. "Tripartite evolutionary game and simulation of solvency supervision under C‐ROSS II based on prospect theory," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 515-528, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:515-528
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4388
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:515-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.