IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v45y2024i6p4240-4257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid pseudo‐Malmquist and Grey–TOPSIS model for group efficiency comparison: Bank credit allocation efficiency comparative analysis in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jialin Guo
  • Desheng Wu

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency of credit allocation among various types of banks in China. Seven different varieties of Chinese banks' performance are examined from 2011 to 2021. We introduce a novel hybrid pseudo‐Malmquist–Grey–TOPSIS model that effectively addresses the need for integrating uncertainty and heuristics in relocation decision‐making. Our analysis reveals that the Joint‐Stock Commercial Bank demonstrates superior performance in terms of credit allocation efficiency. In contrast, rural commercial banks exhibit suboptimal performance when it comes to credit allocation convenience, indicating the importance of prudent credit risk management for this category of banks. It is important to note that the loan allocation performance of each bank category is primarily influenced by the distinct characteristics associated with that specific bank type. However, it is crucial to understand that the success of each bank category's frontier, regardless of its quality, should not be considered a causative determinant of the overall performance of such types of banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialin Guo & Desheng Wu, 2024. "A hybrid pseudo‐Malmquist and Grey–TOPSIS model for group efficiency comparison: Bank credit allocation efficiency comparative analysis in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4240-4257, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4240-4257
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4240-4257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.