IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v45y2024i6p3747-3760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To commit or not? The impact of online reviews on retailers' price commitment strategy in competing supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Zigong Cai
  • Lunhai Liang

Abstract

Online reviews can effectively mitigate consumers' uncertainty about product valuations, thus affecting firms' pricing decisions. This paper develops a two‐period game model to investigate the impacts of online reviews on the retailer's price commitment strategies in two competing supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. In the first period, the retailers strategically set prices and decide whether to commit to prices for their products. In the second period, the retailers adjust product prices in response to online reviews, if they choose not to commit to a price. We show that the retailers' price commitment strategies depend on consumers' perceived uncertainty about product valuations, the information value of online reviews and the unit misfit cost. Interestingly, the retailers can benefit from the information value of online reviews by implementing flexible pricing strategies. Furthermore, if the information value of online reviews is sufficiently high, both retailers will choose not to commit to a price in equilibrium. However, if the information value of online reviews is relatively low, the equilibrium in price commitment is asymmetric, that is, the retailer A commits to a price and its competitor chooses not to commit.

Suggested Citation

  • Zigong Cai & Lunhai Liang, 2024. "To commit or not? The impact of online reviews on retailers' price commitment strategy in competing supply chains," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3747-3760, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:3747-3760
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:3747-3760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.