IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v38y2017i6p822-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Precision and Common Value Partnership Dissolution: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yuri Khoroshilov

Abstract

This paper develops a simple model of ½ auctions in a partnership dissolution game with common values, analyzes how information precision affects the equilibrium, and uses a laboratory study to test the model's predictions. Consistent with the model's prediction, the study shows that when bidders have the same quality information, higher precision leads to more extreme bids. In the case of unequal precision, bidders must use the same bidding functions regardless of their own information quality, and thus, the equilibrium strategy should be the same for both bidders. The experimental results, however, contradicts this prediction. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuri Khoroshilov, 2017. "Information Precision and Common Value Partnership Dissolution: An Experimental Study," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(6), pages 822-831, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:822-831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuri Khoroshilov, 2018. "Partnership Dissolution: Information and Efficiency+," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 133-138, September.
    2. Nicola Dimitri, 2021. "The “Italian Football Federation Auction” for Co-ownership Resolution," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(2), pages 275-285, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:822-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.