IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v38y2017i6p731-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Managerial Ability Really Drive Cost Efficiency? Evidence from Broiler Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond K. Dziwornu

Abstract

This paper ascertains whether managerial ability really drives cost efficiency of broiler businesses. Data was collected from 354 broiler businesses in Ghana and analysed using a modified stochastic Cobb–Douglas cost frontier and inefficiency effect models in a single‐stage maximum likelihood estimation procedure. Results indicate that managerial abilities such as technical advice, age and experience acquired through full‐time farming and increased batches significantly drive cost efficiency. This highlights the need to provide more technical advice and implement periodic capacity building programmes to develop the managerial ability and competences of broiler producers. The youth should also be encouraged and supported through skills development fund to go into full‐time broiler business to produce more batches. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond K. Dziwornu, 2017. "Does Managerial Ability Really Drive Cost Efficiency? Evidence from Broiler Businesses," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(6), pages 731-741, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:731-741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ummad Mazhar, 2021. "Terrorism Risk and the Mediating Role of Manager Experience: Empirical Evidence," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 317-337, September.
    2. Puspita Ghaniy Anggraini & Mahfud Sholihin, 2023. "What do we know about managerial ability? A systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 1-30, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:731-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.