IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v37y2016i4-5p331-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Probability Impact Consumers' Choice? The Case of Online Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon R. Foxall
  • Asle Fagerstrøm
  • Gheorghita Ghinea
  • Lars Sydnes

Abstract

Consumers are frequently in situations that include evaluating the probability of the outcome of a particular choice. It is, therefore, essential to analyze how probability influences choice in order to fully understand consumer behavior. This paper investigates how probability discounting contributes to the understanding of the impact of online reviews on consumer choice. An experiment with 25 participants was conducted. Participants were presented with an online shopping scenario in which they had to choose between two online shops: one with (positive) customer reviews (on delivery reliability and customer service) and higher product prices, while the other had lower prices, but no customer reviews at all. We employed a titration procedure over sales price for the web shop without customer reviews; this was run over seven probability conditions. The point where participants switched between one web shop and another was recorded, and the probability discounting factors were calculated. The results highlight that online reviews are indicators of successful online transactions (i.e., intention to buy) and therefore function as choice benchmarks. In the light of these results, the paper presents practical implications, as well as directions for future research. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon R. Foxall & Asle Fagerstrøm & Gheorghita Ghinea & Lars Sydnes, 2016. "How Does Probability Impact Consumers' Choice? The Case of Online Reviews," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4-5), pages 331-336, 06-07.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:37:y:2016:i:4-5:p:331-336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:37:y:2016:i:4-5:p:331-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.