IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v37y2016i4-5p324-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Study of Intertemporal Choices: The Case of Customer Relationship Management

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon R. Foxall
  • Asle Fagerstrøm
  • Dag Aksnes
  • Erik Arntzen

Abstract

An in‐basket task scenario was arranged where 10 participants were required to prioritize between a short‐term task and a task that was related to a long term‐project. The participants were given an in‐basket task that should be solved within 40 min. They were interrupted by an incoming telephone call five times during the task period (after 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 min). The interruption was related to a long‐term project linked to a bonus payment at the end of the year. Results indicate that 6 out of 10 participants spent less time on an interruption if it occurred late in the 40 min in‐basket task session. This supports the assumptions that, in customer relationship management activities, individuals work on smaller tasks whose outcomes occur sooner rather than on tasks with larger but later outcomes. Hence, the results support the idea that discounted utility of outcomes plays an important role in understanding choices in an organizational setting. Results from the present study indicate that technological drift can be understood within the hyperbolic discounting framework. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon R. Foxall & Asle Fagerstrøm & Dag Aksnes & Erik Arntzen, 2016. "An Experimental Study of Intertemporal Choices: The Case of Customer Relationship Management," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4-5), pages 324-330, 06-07.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:37:y:2016:i:4-5:p:324-330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:37:y:2016:i:4-5:p:324-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.