IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v18y1997i2p113-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Target Costing Performance Based on Alternative Participation and Evaluation Methods: A Laboratory Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Yasuhiro Monden

    (University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, Japan)

  • Mahmuda Akter

    (University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, Japan)

  • Naoto Kubo

    (University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, Japan)

Abstract

This paper deals with the motivational impacts of alternative participation and performance-evaluation methods on the cost- reduction performance of product designers in the product development process. Alternative participation methods for establishing the target cost consist of the participative and the nonparticipative approaches. Also, the alternative performance-evaluation methods include evaluations based on only the controllable item measure and on both controllable and uncontrollable items measures. To test the hypothesis which are proposed with respect to the above impacts, a laboratory experiment was conducted on 120 subjects. When participation and performance evaluation factors are considered separately, the cost-reduction performance of product designers is improved if they can participate in the target-setting process and are evaluated by their controllable item information. In investigating their joint influence, it is found that the combination of the participative method and controllable item and nonparticipative and uncontrollable item information have improved cost-reduction performance. Among all the independent variables, controllable item information is the most dominant variable as it has the strongest influence on cost reduction. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasuhiro Monden & Mahmuda Akter & Naoto Kubo, 1997. "Target Costing Performance Based on Alternative Participation and Evaluation Methods: A Laboratory Experiment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 113-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:18:y:1997:i:2:p:113-129
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199703)18:2<113::AID-MDE814>3.0.CO;2-Y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heinz Ahn & Marcel Clermont & Stephan Schwetschke, 2018. "Research on target costing: past, present and future," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 321-354, August.
    2. Kee, Robert, 2010. "The sufficiency of target costing for evaluating production-related decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 204-211, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:18:y:1997:i:2:p:113-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.