IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v3y1984i3p373-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After the congressional veto: Assessing the alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Robert S. Gilmour
  • Barbara Hinkson Craig

Abstract

Congressional choice of effective replacements for the recently banned legislative veto will require an accurate understanding of the actual results of the now unconstitutional device. The impact of the veto varied strikingly depending on, among other things, the type and target of the veto and on the principal sites of review in Congress itself. No single mechanism will suffice. Rather a variety of devices are available and under consideration. The underlying question raised by this analysis is which effects of the veto are worth perpetuating in light of past results and stated congressional objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert S. Gilmour & Barbara Hinkson Craig, 1984. "After the congressional veto: Assessing the alternatives," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(3), pages 373-392.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:3:y:1984:i:3:p:373-392
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.4050030304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.4050030304
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.4050030304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:3:y:1984:i:3:p:373-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.