IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v37y2018i4p867-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation Of Evidence‐Based Practice In Human Service Organizations: Implications From Agent‐Based Models

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth A. Frank
  • Ran Xu
  • William R. Penuel

Abstract

Much of the impact of a policy depends on how it is implemented, especially as mediated by organizations such as schools or hospitals. Here, we focus on how implementation of evidence‐based practices in human service organizations (e.g., schools, hospitals) is affected by intraorganizational network dynamics. In particular, we hypothesize intraorganizational behavioral divergence and network polarization are likely to occur when actors strongly identify with their organizations. Using agent‐based models, we find that when organizational identification is high, external change agents who attempt to direct organizations by introducing policy aligned messages (e.g., professional development emphasizing specific teaching practices) may unintentionally contribute to divergence in practice and polarization in networks, inhibiting full implementation of the desired practices as well as reducing organizational capacity to absorb new practices. Thus, the external change agent should consider the interaction between the type of message and the intraorganizational network dynamics driven by organizational identification.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth A. Frank & Ran Xu & William R. Penuel, 2018. "Implementation Of Evidence‐Based Practice In Human Service Organizations: Implications From Agent‐Based Models," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 867-895, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:37:y:2018:i:4:p:867-895
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.22081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.22081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:37:y:2018:i:4:p:867-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.