IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v18y1999i3p473-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A “Building-up” approach to measuring program costs

Author

Listed:
  • James C. Ohls

    (Mathematica Policy Research)

  • Linda C. Rosenberg

    (Mathematica Policy Research)

  • Janet A. Weiss

    (School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • James C. Ohls & Linda C. Rosenberg & Janet A. Weiss, 1999. "A “Building-up” approach to measuring program costs," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 473-480.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:473-480
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<473::AID-PAM9>3.0.CO;2-T
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:1206 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Thomas M. Fraker & Alberto P. Martini & James C. Ohls & Michael Ponza & Elizabeth A. Quinn, 1992. "The Evaluation of the Alabama Food Stamp Cash-Out Demonstration Vol. 2: Administrative Outcomes, Overall Conclusions, and Appendices," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f8c9ad58d9af49689a0d600e2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:2836 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:1253 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Burwick & Debra Strong & Yange Xue & Heather Koball & Brandon Coffee-Borden & Heather Zaveri & Kimberly Boller & Deborah Daro, "undated". "Supporting Evidence-Based Home Visiting to Prevent Child Maltreatment: Cross-Site Evaluation Cost Study Background and Design Update," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 322d22a1c4184661b001c363c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Charlotte Cabili & Pia Caronongan & Philip Gleason & Ronette Briefel & Nicholas Redel & Sarah Forrestal & Gregory Chojnacki & Breanna Wakar, "undated". "Evaluation of Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger (EDECH): The Virginia 365 Project," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4d42482f2cb846678f8328a81, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Ronette Briefel & Gregory Chojnacki & Vivian Gabor & Philip Gleason & Rebecca Kleinman & Nicholas Redel & Michael Cavanaugh & Charlotte Cabili & Breanna Wakar & Sarah Forrestal, "undated". "Evaluation of Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger (EDECH): The Chickasaw Nation Packed Promise Project," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1828afdbfd6a4d88bc0ee0c9c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Andrew Gothro & Gregory Chojnacki & Rebecca Kleinman & Philip Gleason & Nicholas Redel & Breanna Wakar & Sarah Forrestal & Ronette Briefel, "undated". "Evaluation of Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger (EDECH): The Kentucky Ticket to Healthy Food Project," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d701a5e62bfb4b6a89e7bf6bd, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Philip Gleason & Rebecca Kleinman & Gregory Chojnacki & Sarah Forrestal & Nicholas Redel & Breanna Wakar & Ronette Briefel, "undated". "Evaluation of Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger (EDECH): The Nevada Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Project," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7a171f0e1b1c484aa5d64ea1e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Alicia Meckstroth & Andrew Burwick & Michael Ponza & Shawn Marsh & Timothy Novak & Shannon Phillips & Nuria Diaz-Tena & Judy Ng, "undated". "Paths to Work in Rural Places: Key Findings and Lessons from the Impact Evaluation of the Future Steps Rural Welfare-to-Work Program," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 282b9e49acba46ff855d515a5, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diane Whitmore, 2002. "What Are Food Stamps Worth?," Working Papers 847, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    2. Diane Whitmore, 2002. "What Are Food Stamps Worth?," Working Papers 847, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:473-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.