IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v11y1992i4p637-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of weapon system acquisition reform efforts

Author

Listed:
  • Frederick P. Biery

Abstract

Most Americans believe that their nation's weapon acquisition system is one of the worst-managed activities in the public or private sectors. Although the process has been the subject of many reform efforts, it is reasonable to ask whether these reform efforts had any success. This article examines the effectiveness of such reforms by reviewing the results of the acquisition process. This analysis, using measures of the extent of cost growth and schedule slippage, indicates a trend toward improvement in the acquisition process, at least up to the 1980s. Acquisition results from the decade of the 1980s suggest some stalling in this trend. However, when the process is compared to other public and private sector acquisition systems, it appears to be performing well.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederick P. Biery, 1992. "The effectiveness of weapon system acquisition reform efforts," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 637-664.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:11:y:1992:i:4:p:637-664
    DOI: 10.2307/3324960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3324960
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/3324960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan D. Ritschel, 2012. "Efficacy of US Legislation in Military Acquisition Programmes: N unn– M cCurdy Act Unveiled," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 491-500, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:11:y:1992:i:4:p:637-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.