IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p633-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Kuusisto
  • Jenni Santavirta
  • Kaija Saranto
  • Elina Haavisto

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe healthcare professionals’ perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care unit in hospital ward or outpatient clinic. Background Clinical guidelines recommend timely ACP as a central component of patient‐centred palliative care. However, the ACP concept and terminology have been judged to be confusing, and practices are not established. Professionals’ views are needed for ACP adoption and usage. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods The study used purposive sampling. The data were collected through focus group interviews with registered nurses and practical nurses and individual or couple interviews with physicians and social workers. The data (n = 33) were analysed by inductive content analysis. The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Results Three main categories emerged: Information content of ACP, coordination of care activities through ACP, and support for patients’ and family members’ coping. The information content of ACP included assessment of need for patient care, preparing for changes in patient's state of health and proactive medication. Coordination of care activities through ACP contained ACP care planning, cooperation and work practices between healthcare professionals. Support for patients’ and family members’ coping included communication between patient, family members and professionals and promoting patient self‐care. Conclusions ACP is a useful and proactive tool for integrating patient‐centred information, care and services as well as support for patients’ and family members’ coping. Palliative care activities can be coordinated through ACP in a multidisciplinary manner. ACP is significant and relevant for both professionals’ work and patient care throughout the service system. Relevance to clinical practice Results highlight the importance of proactive, concrete and holistic ACP. ACP should be up to date to reflect patient's current wishes. Raising professional awareness and implementing ACP into work processes are essential. Results can be utilised in planning and implementing interprofessional in‐service training.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Kuusisto & Jenni Santavirta & Kaija Saranto & Elina Haavisto, 2021. "Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 633-644, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:633-644
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15578
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li‐Shan Ke & Xiaoyan Huang & Margaret O'Connor & Susan Lee, 2015. "Nurses' views regarding implementing advance care planning for older people: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2057-2073, August.
    2. Christopher Shanley & Elizabeth Whitmore & David Conforti & Janine Masso & Sanjay Jayasinghe & Rhonda Griffiths, 2011. "Decisions about transferring nursing home residents to hospital: highlighting the roles of advance care planning and support from local hospital and community health services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2897-2906, October.
    3. Anne Kuusisto & Jenni Santavirta & Kaija Saranto & Päivi Korhonen & Elina Haavisto, 2020. "Advance care planning for patients with cancer in palliative care: A scoping review from a professional perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2069-2082, July.
    4. Douglas H. Blackwood & David Walker & Monty G. Mythen & Rachel M. Taylor & Cecilia Vindrola‐Padros, 2019. "Barriers to advance care planning with patients as perceived by nurses and other healthcare professionals: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4276-4297, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suet Ying Ng & Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, 2021. "The Role Complexities in Advance Care Planning for End-of-Life Care—Nursing Students’ Perception of the Nursing Profession," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Hsueh-Hsing Pan & Li-Fen Wu & Li-Fang Chang & Yu-Chun Hung & Chin Lin & Ching-Liang Ho, 2021. "Effects of Dispositional Resilience and Self-Efficacy on Practice in Advanced Care Planning of Terminally Ill Patients among Taiwanese Nurses: A Study Using Path Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. I-Hui Chen & Shu-Fen Kuo & Yen-Kuang Lin & Tsai-Wei Huang, 2022. "Knowledge of and Barriers to Palliative Care Perceived by Healthcare Providers before and after Promotion of the Patient Autonomy Act: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Alexandra Pulst & Alexander Maximilian Fassmer & Falk Hoffmann & Guido Schmiemann, 2020. "Paramedics’ Perspectives on the Hospital Transfers of Nursing Home Residents—A Qualitative Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Rebecca Carabez & Megan Scott, 2016. "‘Nurses don't deal with these issues’: nurses’ role in advance care planning for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(23-24), pages 3707-3715, December.
    6. Silvia Sörensen & Rachel L. Missell & Alexander Eustice‐Corwin & Dorine A. Otieno, 2021. "Perspectives on Aging‐Related Preparation," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 163-221, March.
    7. Douglas H. Blackwood & David Walker & Monty G. Mythen & Rachel M. Taylor & Cecilia Vindrola‐Padros, 2019. "Barriers to advance care planning with patients as perceived by nurses and other healthcare professionals: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4276-4297, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:633-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.