IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p581-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting the methods right: Challenges and appropriateness of mixed methods research in health‐related doctoral studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa McKenna
  • Beverley Copnell
  • Graeme Smith

Abstract

Aims To examine issues around the use of mixed methods research in doctoral research in nursing and healthcare. We raise questions around challenges and appropriateness of this type of research methodology for doctoral students. Background In recent years, mixed methods research has grown rapidly in health‐related research. As an emerging research methodology, mixed methods research has much to offer doctoral researchers in health care who increasingly are faced with complex research issues. However, despite evolving as a research paradigm, researchers from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives have hotly debated application of mixed methods approaches. The body of supporting knowledge underpinning mixed methods research continues to grow and become refined. Evolving complexities pose new challenges for newly‐enrolled doctoral students. Design Discussion paper. Method Using a discursive approach, we raise questions around the challenges and appropriateness of this type of research methodology for doctoral students. Results Mixed methods research poses a unique range of methodological challenges that need to be carefully considered by research students when choosing their research methodology. These include scope of methodological learning required, additional time for data collection and analysis, need to acquire additional skill sets, approaches to reporting study results, dissemination of findings and specific supervisory support and thesis examination issues. Conclusions Mixed methods approaches can make important contributions to clinical research. However, their application to doctoral studies is challenging and should only be considered where appropriate to answer the research question. Relevance to clinical practice Mixed methods research approaches are commonly used in doctoral studies undertaken to understand clinical nursing practice and can make an important contribution to knowledge. However, there is a need for appropriate application of the methodology to ensure strong, appropriate research outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa McKenna & Beverley Copnell & Graeme Smith, 2021. "Getting the methods right: Challenges and appropriateness of mixed methods research in health‐related doctoral studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 581-587, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:581-587
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15534
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme D. Smith & Leslie Gelling & Carol Haigh & Sue Barnason & Helen Allan & Kay Penny & Debra Jackson, 2018. "Transparency in the reporting of nursing research," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 475-477, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:581-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.