IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1365-1371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding in a rural Australian setting

Author

Listed:
  • Leah East
  • Dianne Targett
  • Hamish Yeates
  • Elizabeth Ryan
  • Louisa Quiddington
  • Cindy Woods

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding in a rural Australian hospital setting and examine which aspects of care predict satisfaction. Background Intentional rounding is a systematic process used by healthcare professionals to anticipate and address the fundamental needs of hospitalised patients. Despite a wealth of literature about nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding, no studies have compared nurse and patient satisfaction, and little is known about intentional rounding in a rural setting. Design A cross‐sectional study was undertaken with nursing staff and patients at a rural hospital and reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines. Methods Nurses (n = 63) and patients (n = 66) were invited to complete the Patient Satisfaction Survey between April and June 2018. Nurse and patient responses were compared and predictors of nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding care were determined using generalised estimating equation models. Results Both nurses and patients positively rated satisfaction with all aspects of nursing care provided and received through intentional rounding. Nurses' satisfaction with care provided to patients through intentional rounding was predicted by interest in patients' feelings about their care. Patient satisfaction with the care they received whilst hospitalised was predicted by the ability to see a nurse when they needed to, the provision of pain relief when needed, feeling comfortable and safe, and the perception that nurses were interested in their feelings about their care. Conclusion Intentional rounding is a means for nurses to regularly attend to patients' emotional and physical needs, which is central to patients feeling safe and cared for whilst hospitalised. Relevance to clinical practice Intentional rounding practices ensure that patients feel genuinely cared for by nursing staff whilst hospitalised and can improve nurse and patient interactions, satisfaction and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah East & Dianne Targett & Hamish Yeates & Elizabeth Ryan & Louisa Quiddington & Cindy Woods, 2020. "Nurse and patient satisfaction with intentional rounding in a rural Australian setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1365-1371, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1365-1371
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15180
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kate Kirk & Ros Kane, 2016. "A qualitative exploration of intentional nursing round models in the emergency department setting: investigating the barriers to their use and success," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1262-1272, May.
    2. Kelli Flowers & Kylie Wright & Rachel Langdon & Maureen McIlwrath & Craig Wainwright & Maree Johnson, 2016. "Intentional rounding: facilitators, benefits and barriers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1346-1355, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska & Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska, 2021. "Priority Setting in the Polish Health Care System According to Patients’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-8, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatemeh Mohammadipour & Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh & Soroor Parvizy & Meimanat Hosseini, 2017. "An explanatory study on the concept of nursing presence from the perspective of patients admitted to hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4313-4324, December.
    2. Angela Christiansen & Linda Coventry & Renée Graham & Elisabeth Jacob & Di Twigg & Lisa Whitehead, 2018. "Intentional rounding in acute adult healthcare settings: A systematic mixed‐method review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1759-1792, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1365-1371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.